The bronze hoard was discovered on the territory of Mîndrești village, Telenești district, in 1968. It was identified accidentally by a group of students from the village school, and the materials later came to the attention of specialists at the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences. According to documentary records, the hoard was composed of ten pieces: four socketed axes (celts), a dagger fragment, a sword fragment, a sickle, a winged axe, an adze-axe, and a chain consisting of four links. Currently, of the mentioned assemblage, six objects are preserved in the collections of the National Museum of History of Moldova: two socketed axes (celts), the winged axe, the adze-axe, the dagger fragment, and the chain made of four links.- Socketed axe (celt) with one loop. Dimensions: Length - 10.2 cm; Weight - 186 g. - Socketed axe (celt) with one frontal loop. Dimensions: Length - 8.4 cm; Width: 33-46 mm; Weight - 124 g. - Winged axe. Dimensions: Length - 14.0 cm; Width - 2.5-3.4 cm; Weight - 285 g. - Adze-axe. Dimensions: Length - 14.8 cm; Width - 2.3-5.0 cm; Weight - 286 g. - Dagger fragment. Dimensions: Length - 16.5 cm; Blade length - 9.8 cm; Blade width - 2.8 cm; Weight - 81 g. - Chain formed of four links. Dimensions: Length - 17.1 cm; Link diameter - 3.8; Weight - 32 g.The bronze hoard of Mîndrești is important due to the association of objects that find analogies in the regional repertoire with pieces that show clear analogies in Central Europe and the Carpathian Basin. The assemblage reflects a zone of contact and interaction where metallic forms of different origins and traditions circulated and were integrated into the repertoire of local communities. Chronologically, the bronze hoard of Mîndrești is attributed to the Early Hallstatt period - HaA1, being dated to 1200-1100 BC.
All scientific articles submitted for publication in the journal "Tyragetia" are reviewed under the peer reviewsystem.
The peer review is an evaluation of scientific work by two referees with equal rights, which check compliance of publication, identify deviations from the standards of the journal and make suggestions for improving the quality of the publication.
Copies of articles received (hard copy or digital version) in the office are transmitted by the chief editor or the editorial secretary to researchers who are considered experts in the field and are part of the Journal’s list of peer reviewers.
Reviewers write (within 30 days) one review of the article received which is handed to the editorial secretary. The latter, transmits all comments made by reviewers to the authors. Upon request, the reviewers may remain anonymous to the author of the reviewed article.
The evaluation of articles aims at verification of the following:
- article corresponds to journal profile;
- compliance with publication rules and structure of the article;
- the results presented are sufficiently innovative and interesting in order to justify publication;
- quality of scientific content;
- respect of ethical principles;
- relevance of bibliographic sources.
Reviewers' assessment should include in the end one of the following recommendations for the article analyzed:
- unconditional acceptance of article;
- acceptance on condition to make the mentioned changes in the review;
- reject the article.
If only one review received negative assessment, the chief editor can request a third review of the article. If the article is considered to need further revision, it is returned to the author with necessary recommendations.
The bronze hoard was discovered on the territory of Mîndrești village, Telenești district, in 1968. It was identified accidentally by a group of students from the village school, and the materials later came to the attention of specialists at the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences...
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
31 August 1989 St., 121 A, MD 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
