EN RO















#Exhibit of the Month

>>>


The 21 beads form part of a bronze hoard found in 2019 within a forested area close to the town of Nisporeni. Alongside the beads, the hoard included numerous bronze ornaments (2 Röschitz-Sanislău-type fibulae, 7 necklaces, 12 rings, 22 tubes, 23 bracelets, and approximately 80 appliqués), one coral bead and a pendant made from a wild animal's tooth. At present, the amber beads are preserved in the collections of the Muzeul Național de Istorie a Moldovei, while the remainder of the hoard is in the possession of a private collector.
The hoard was discovered accidentally in a pit about 50 cm deep. The objects in this hoard are of Western origin, with known parallels in archaeological complexes from Poland, Hungary, Serbia, and Slovakia, and, to a lesser extent, in Romania. The presence of this bronze hoard on the territory of the Republic of Moldova illustrates the cultural dynamics of the region during the Early Iron Age and a fundamental shift in the vector of cultural influences from east to west.
The amber bead strand comprises 16 whole beads and five fragmentary ones. They have an elongated biconical shape and vary in size. The beads are brown-reddish in color; their lengths range from 1.1 to 3.1 cm, widths from 0.6 to 1.4 cm, thicknesses from 0.6 to 1.1 cm, and the perforation diameter ranges between 0.2 and 0.3 cm.
Amber beads appear in several bronze hoards dated to the Late Bronze Age in the eastern half of Slovakia and in Transdanubian Hungary. Parallels are also known from the Cioclovina Cave in Romania. With the onset of the Iron Age, amber items disappear from the Carpathian Basin for approximately 300 years, reappearing alongside the arrival of Scythian elements.
The bronze hoard discovered at Nisporeni is dated to the HaA2-HaB1-2 interval (1050/1000 - 800/750 B.C.).

Virtual Tour


Publications Journal „Tyragetia"   vol. I [XVI], nr. 1


Late Scythian Settlements in the Lower Dnieper Region: chronology and attribution
ISSN 1857-0240
E-ISSN 2537-6330

Late Scythian Settlements in the Lower Dnieper Region: chronology and attribution

Tyragetia, serie nouă, vol. I [XVI], nr. 1, Arheologie. Istorie Antică

The lower Dnieper region is usually regarded as a distinct territory of Scythian culture. In the 1980s and 1990s as a result of excavations in the lower Dnieper region the archaeological record has been expanded. The appearance of new information concerning archaeological monuments in the lower Dnieper Region begged attempts to offer its interpretation. Subsequently, new archaeological finds allowed addressing questions of chronology and the ethnocultural attribution of the population of the region.

For the period from the second quarter of the III c. to at least the second half of the II c. BC archaeological evidence for the population of the area, whether settled or nomadic, is lacking. In the II and I c. the situation in the lower Dnieper region stabilized and Late Scythian settlements started to appear. The chronological indicators from all the Late Scythian settlements in the region are analysed in the article, and the dating is based mainly on Greek imports. The most probable date for their foundation is the I c. BC with a single exclusion - Znamenskoe settlement was the earliest and was founded possibly in the second half of the II c. BC.

The comparison of data from different sites can help us to define similarities and differentiating features of the Late Scythian fortified settlements, Scythian monuments and the Olbian chora. It became possible to identify with certainty the barbarian type of the Late Scythian culture, and the syncretism of this culture has been demonstrated.

The possibility of development of Scythian sites into Late Scythian fortified settlements contradicts both the chronology and the types of culture. Similar elements in Scythian and Late Scythian settlements are the ramparts and ditches in fortification, some types of buildings, and iron workshops. Both groups of settlements are known for a large proportion of handmade pottery, also of Scythian forms. Small number of coins, predominance of stone articles and the use of ornaments are common. In both groups the main bulk of the ceramic material comprises amphorae and handmade pottery, but the percentage of the wheel-made pottery is different. Handmade pottery in the Late Scythian settlements is much more varied than in the earlier ones. Difference between Scythian and Late Scythian groups are observed in the emergence in the late stage of new features in fortification, the appearance of “zolniki” (large accumulations of ash which are connected with agricultural cults), building construction and handmade pottery, as well in the volume and nature of Greek imports, ritual objects, and fishing-gear.

The comparison of the northern groups of settlements demonstrates that the barbarian tradition displays no clear continuity in its development. While the early northern group of settlements belongs to the Scythian culture, in the sites of the later stage only isolated elements are specific. Indications of cultural impact from the west, particularly from the Geto-Dacian world, are striking.

As far as the theory of predominance of Greek culture in the Late Scythian culture has been revisited, it is important to compare Late Scythian settlements of the lower Dnieper region with the Olbian chora sites. There are differences in size, stratigraphy, building traditions, fortification, dwellings, workshops, pottery, coins, and in the range of crops and domestic animals. They also differ in the time of their appearance (the Late Scythian group is earlier) and in the period of their existence. In Late Scythian settlements barbarian features are predominant. One may see a trace of Greek influence in the finds of two terra cottae, but cult objects retain a barbarian character.

The absence of settlements on the banks of the lower Dnieper from the second quarter of the III to the second half of the II c. BC suggested that there were possibly Scythian migrations. This is contemporary with the crisis on the northern coast of the Black Sea in the III c. BC. Taking into account the revised chronology and the ethno-cultural attribution of the settlements we can now offer a new account of the situation with an emphasis on the interaction of different ethno-cultural groups. The disappearance in the III c. BC of Scythian graves and settlements from the lower Dnieper region coincides with the appearance of the Scythians in the Crimea and Dobrudja. In the latter their presence is traceable from the turn of the IV – III cc. BC. The final phase of Scythia Minor in this territory is dated from the last quarter of the II to the beginning of the I c. BC. The character and chronology of the Late Scythian culture in the lower Dnieper region suggest that it could be created as a result of migration of the population embracing different cultures and ethnic types from Dobrudja.




 

 

Independent Moldova
Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic
Bessarabia and MASSR between the Two World Wars
Bessarabia and Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic in the Period between the Two World Wars
Revival of National Movement
Time of Reforms and their Consequences
Abolition of Autonomy. Bessarabia – a New Tsarist Colony
Period of Relative Autonomy of Bessarabia within the Russian Empire
Phanariot Regime
Golden Age of the Romanian Culture
Struggle for Maintaining of Independence of Moldova
Formation of Independent Medieval State of Moldova
Era of the
Great Nomad Migrations
Early Middle Ages
Iron Age and Antiquity
Bronze Age
Aeneolithic Age
Neolithic Age
Palaeolithic Age
  
  

Come to Museum! Discover the History!
  
Visit museum
Visit museum
Summer schedule: daily
10am – 6pm.

Winter schedule: daily
10am – 5pm.
Closed on Mondays.
Entrance fees:  adults - 50 MDL, Pensioners, students - 20 lei, pupils - 10 MDL. Free access: enlisted men (...)

WiFi Free Wi-Fi Zone in the museum: In the courtyard of the National History Museum of Moldova there is Wi-Fi Internet access for visitors.


#Exhibit of the Month

The 21 beads form part of a bronze hoard found in 2019 within a forested area close to the town of Nisporeni. Alongside the beads, the hoard included numerous bronze ornaments (2 Röschitz-Sanislău-type fibulae, 7 necklaces, 12 rings, 22 tubes, 23 bracelets, and approximately 80 appliqués), one coral bead and a pendant made from a wild animal's tooth...

Read More >>

































The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
©2006-2026 National Museum of History of Moldova
Visit museum 31 August 1989 St., 121 A, MD 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
Phones:
Secretariat: +373 (22) 24-43-25
Department of Public Relations and Museum Education: +373 (22) 24-04-26
Fax: +373 (22) 24-43-69
E-mail: office@nationalmuseum.md
Technical Support: info@nationalmuseum.md
Web site administration and maintenance: Andrei EMILCIUC

 



The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
©2006-2026 National Museum of History of Moldova
Visit museum 31 August 1989 St., 121 A, MD 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
Phones:
Secretariat: +373 (22) 24-43-25
Department of Public Relations and Museum Education: +373 (22) 24-04-26
Fax: +373 (22) 24-43-69
E-mail: office@nationalmuseum.md
Technical Support: info@nationalmuseum.md
Web site administration and maintenance: Andrei EMILCIUC

menu
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
©2006-2026 National Museum of History of Moldova
Visit museum 31 August 1989 St., 121 A, MD 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
Phones:
Secretariat: +373 (22) 24-43-25
Department of Public Relations and Museum Education: +373 (22) 24-04-26
Fax: +373 (22) 24-43-69
E-mail: office@nationalmuseum.md
Technical Support: info@nationalmuseum.md
Web site administration and maintenance: Andrei EMILCIUC